Posted On:

Last Updated:

How to Actually Increase Powerline Adapter Throughput


I’ve been tinkering with my Powerline adapters recently, on a mission to improve the bandwidth available to my office. I’ve been familiar with Powerline adapters for a long time, having started with some of those “up to 85Mbps” devices. Imagine my disappointment when I couldn’t get even 16Mbps through it on my slow ADSL internet at the time, I got 8Mbps!

I’m sure by now you’ve found countless internet articles written for clicks that don’t have any real scientific basis, probably telling you to mess with MTU settings and the such, forget all that. We’re going to make changes based on actual science here!

Why should you believe me? Because I managed to actually more than double my throughput from 130Mbps to 300Mbps on my less than stellar (read: old) wiring. Details on this are at the end of the post.

In this blog post we’ll go through some basics around the different Powerline standards and then get into the optimisations, feel free to skip ahead to the optimisations section if you’re not interested.

Standards

When Powerline adapters were a somewhat shiny and new concept, we saw standards come out such as HomePlug AV, later followed by HomePlug AV2 from the HomePlug Powerline Alliance (R.I.P), and more interestingly G.hn. I say interestingly as a lot of these standards are old, but we’re continuing to see incremental performance increases from G.hn, now sporting speeds of “up to” 2.4Gbps.

I say “up to” because, we’re actually talking about the speed of the Powerline rate here, which is different to the network transmission rate, or “bandwidth” we actually want to see. In summary, the conversion rate is typically around 30-35%. So if you’ve got 1000Mbps Powerline rate, then you should see around 300-350Mbps throughput. If this is the level of throughput ratio you’re already seeing, I suggest you stop now, you won’t magically increase your throughput further, but you might find some of these questionable guides that are available online result in nothing more than breaking your connection or causing issues with applications/services due to non-standard settings. However, if you are reaching the maximum speed of your device and there’s a faster version available, it could be worth the upgrade, if you can’t reach the maximum Powerline rate for your existing equipment, it’s less likely that you’ll see a meaningful performance uplift by replacing the hardware, if you’ll see any performance uplift at all.

Optimisations

Powerline adapters work by sending and receiving signals via your electrical wiring, so a good connection to this potential network is key. Here is some advice on optimising this connection, any why:

  • Ensure your Powerline adapters are directly connected to the socket, not via a surge protector or extension lead. These devices will typically “stabilise” the “noise” on the power line (our data in this case), which will result in a lower throughput speed.
  • Expanding on this, and something I only discovered recently, treat multi-plug wall sockets as if the Powerline adapter is on an extension lead, these neighbours generate an interference in the data signal. Whilst yes you’re not going to have a dedicated power network for data transmission (it’d be far easier and cheaper to just run ethernet at that point), the goal is to put some space between devices that are generating noise, this will lower the disruption to the data signal.
  • Some sockets are “spurs” from an “upstream” socket rather than part of the core network loop, performance will be subpar on these compared to being part of the core ring network, as you’re beholden to the noise generated and filtered on that upstream socket(s) more so than a standard ring network.
  • More Powerline devices in an environment can reduce interference by relaying the signal. This is because all Powerline devices will receive the signal on its way around the wiring, and perform both filtering of the existing noise on the line that isn’t network data, and amplify the signal again. This will only work if your devices are within the same ring network, as otherwise the connection will be traversing RCDs or even MCBs on your consumer unit/fuse board/electrical fuse box – whichever name you know it as.
  • For those attempting to connect between different ring networks, more likely in modern electrical wiring than those houses of old, devices have started to reach the market that integrate into your fuse board. Devolo for example offer a “Magic 2 LAN DINrail” device that promises to boost internet performance via this integration, supporting three phases and earth as transmission channels too for a Powerline speed of up to 2400Mbps. I can’t comment on the performance of this product personally, but it’s an interesting evolution of Powerline technology.
  • A second comment related to having multiple rings within your electrical wiring, but less related to Powerline itself. I’d like to share some guidance with those using Powerline adapters with built in Wifi. Whilst it’s tempting to put the Powerline adapter in the place you want the Wifi signal boost the most, if this is an upstairs office on a separate electrical ring, you could find improved performance by placing the Powerline adapter near your location, but in the room on the ground floor below. You would still receive a strong Wifi signal, but with the added potential benefit of increased bandwidth available via the Wifi due to the Powerline Adapter achieving greater speeds.
  • MIMO-capable devices: A Powerline network is a Half-Duplex network, meaning the available bandwidth is split between send & receive traffic. It’s quite rare you’d have an application that would only be sending or receiving traffic, so instead your Powerline devices must time-share between sending and receiving. To elaborate further on this, a Powerline network is a “hub” network, instead of a “switch” network, which means that regardless of how many Powerline adapters you have within your network, only one may send traffic at a time. This is the case for a SISO (Single-Input Single-Output) network. Multiple-Input Multiple-Output (MIMO) capable devices utilise the multiple wires in your electrical circuits to send and receive signals simultaneously across the different wires, whilst it is still a hub network, you’ve got multiple paths to send and receive down, reducing network jitter and increasing throughput. In some scenarios, you might find MIMO results in a reduction of throughput, if this is the case, you would commonly have one or more dodgy/faulty wires in your circuit that are reducing the effectiveness of your Powerline network through packet loss and retransmission attempts.
  • More distance = more signal degradation. This is a simple one, the further the signal has to travel, the more likely it will degrade and not be received successfully by the other Powerline device(s). Whilst it can be tempting to put the Powerline adapter as near to the intended ethernet device(s) as possible, you could be adding significant additional distance between your Powerline devices, with additional, noise-introducing devices in-between. If you’re working with a single ring network, prior to the final placement of your Powerline devices, do some speed tests with the two Powerline devices on different sockets in their relevant rooms. This is because electrical wiring is run as a ring, running from your fuse board to an electrical socket, then onto the next, and the next, until eventually it has reached the last socket in the ring, and then it is connected again to the fuse board. Because of this, changing the socket used can potentially reduce metres off of the connection path, and reduce potentially a dozen different sources of electrical noise, as you could be moving your devices to sockets that are closer to each other, or have fewer additional sockets between them. If you’re trying to get a faster throughput, you could find a better result by getting the Powerline into the same room that you want it to be in, but running a longer ethernet, potentially trunked, concealed in skirting board, or even run under the carpet, to your intended destination.
  • VDSL – Another technology that is sending data down a copper wire is VDSL, commonly known in the U.K. as FTTC internet. Unfortunately the frequency bands that VDSL and Powerline communicate on can overlap, depending on the VDSL profile used. This is a common problem if the phone line and power cables run too close to each other. Whilst there’s generic guidance to be had here around spacing and shielding of such cables, instead I’ll be focusing on Powerline adapter technology. Some vendors offer interference mitigation, either automatically or manually, that can be avoid interference with your VDSL connection, resulting in a lower likelihood of performance impact to your internet, whilst boosting Powerline performance through the reduction in noise on the electrical wires.
  • Manufacturer differences – I hate to have a generic sounding item on this list, but it’s true. Each device manufacturer writes their firmware differently, with different tolerances and different performance/stability outputs from this. As part of my network troubleshooting, I swapped my 1200Mbps Netgear Powerline adapters for a pair of devolo 1200Mbps adapters. These devices both supported the same features such as MIMO, but the devolo cockpit software would allow me to see transmission & receive speeds on the Powerline that would give me a better base understanding of the network. But firstly, I put them in the existing place of my Netgear devices. I was unexpectedly, but pleasantly surprised to see that my throughput went from 120-130Mbps to 150-160Mbps and my jitter had noticeably smoothed too. My Netgear devices could provide a slightly lower minimum jitter figure, but the devolo devices more than made up for that with vastly improved average and maximum jitter values.
  • Another potential increase in throughput can be gained by devices that will expand upon MIMO by also using Wifi as a send & receive option too. I would be cautious on this one, unless the Wifi signal is great, you’re likely going to risk increased packet loss and jitter via the use of wireless. Not to mention that 2.4Ghz has a longer/stronger signal range, at the trade-off of lower throughput vs 5/6Ghz frequencies, but 2.4Ghz only has 3 channels that don’t overlap, meaning you could quite easily reduce your Wifi experience by attempting this. If you do opt to use this, be sure you have a strong Wifi signal between the devices that is offering a consistent speed, and be sure to put this on a wireless channel that you aren’t using your own Wifi network on, to prevent interference.

Real-World Results

So, putting this all together. I migrated my Powerline adapters from Netgear to Devolo, and say an up to 30Mbps bandwidth improvement (from 130 up to 160Mbps), these devices were at opposite ends of the house. I migrated my front of house device to a single-socket electrical point and saw negligible increase in throughput. My devolo metrics had reported an increase in receive speed but not in transmission for the back of my house, so that was clearly my bottleneck at this point. Next, I moved my back of house Powerline adapter to the front of the next room, and ran a 10 metre ethernet cable to my desk. I saw a doubling of throughput on the devices. The Powerline Speed had gone from around 490-520Mbps receive and 380-400Mbps transmit to a solid 1000-1020Mbps send & receive on both devices. And my speed test then confirmed this, with speeds of around 300Mbps bandwidth. As the devices had a maximum theoretical Powerline speed of 1200Mbps, I was confident I’d found a true improvement.

I then moved to a nearer socket, a few metres away from the one I’d just used, I saw a reduction in Powerline speed to 800-820Mbps, but it was close enough that I could tuck a 5 metre ethernet lead under my carpet to my desk. If I want to increase this further, I can now look at G.hn standard devices that operate at up to 2400Mbps and see about further improvements, but I’m happy with my bandwidth uplift, and that’ll be a project for another day.

To close, some other notes about my environment. My house is nearing 100 years old, with all the electrical sockets in the house residing on a single ring, I’ve got a modern fuse box, but the wiring is decades old, some of it being the original retrofit of electrical cabling into the house. So this is by no means a “pristine lab” environment.

24 responses to “How to Actually Increase Powerline Adapter Throughput”

  1. Just wanted to say thanks for this- based on your suggestions I started examining my powerline setup which was painfully slow (around ~2-10 Mbps off of a fiber connection). Removed a touch lamp from one of the outlets, and moved the powerline receiver and connected access point to separate outlets. Now I’m seeing around 30-40 Mbps consistently, which is more than good enough until I have time to optimize more. Thanks!

    -David

    Like

    1. Glad to hear this helped you! Hopefully when you come to optimise you see even better results!

      Like

  2. Thank you for this information. I came across it after spending considerable time contemplating alternative solutions. I had even considered using a Wi-Fi adapter bridge, as I don’t have the option of running an Ethernet cable from my router (located under the stairs) to my workstation upstairs.

    After reading your article, I made two changes:

    1. Moved the powerline adapter near the router to a wall socket.
    2. Relocated the adapter near my workstation from a surge protector extension to a single extension.

    As a result, my speed has increased dramatically from approximately 28 Mb/s to around 79 Mb/s. This is still well below the speed I get with WiFi, but I will take it for now.

    Thank you for sharing such valuable insights; they’ve been really helpful.

    Like

    1. Glad to hear it made such a difference! To get any additional speed increases you can look at newer generation powerline devices, or yes the wireless bridge route. If you go down the wireless bridge route then make sure that your WiFi has a dedicated mesh channel, have recently seen some that mesh using the same WiFi channel as your normal WiFi and it really hampers throughput!

      Like

  3. thanks for the article, i found it after having several headaches with my devolo powerline 1200+. My house has several electrical rings, i could reach at most around 70mbs. That is still way below the bandwidth i can reach with Tplink mesh X50wifi setup. So after trying several things, many of them mentioned in the article, i have finally gave up.

    In first place, I bought the devolo coz unfortunately my office was built after the house and there is not a very practical way to install a cat5e cable to integrate to the rest of the house, so i thought this would be an easy way to leverage the decos capabilities, i was too naive.

    I think i will give it a try to install an utp cable through part of an electrical conduct, in the end, i shall have done that in the very first place.

    Anyway i will keep the devolos, i think sometime will become handy. Im that kind of people that accumulate stuff.

    Like

    1. Hi Fede, the Devolo Powerline 1200+ is what I was using and whilst they’re certainly capable, all these Powerline devices fall down in less than ideal conditions. I did see that Devolo offer a device that installs onto your fuse board directly to help with multi-ring networks but I’ve not tried this myself to confirm how successful it is.

      A couple of things: cat5e isn’t going to go to 10Gbps and beyond so as the cost difference is so minimal I’d suggest going for a CAT6A cable. The other thing is if there’s any live electricity running through that conduct, you’ll have the risk of cross-talk, more so with CAT6/CAT6A than CAT5E but it’s a risk all the same, be sure to get a shielded cable in that scenario, the better the shielding, the less likely to have interference. The best option is an SF/FTP cable, but I’d at least look at a SF/UTP cable or an S/FTP.

      Like

      1. Beyond 10Gbps? Does anyone have a device that actually can use that speed? (Even NVMe drives can output at speeds that go beyond 2.5Gbps).

        I watched a YouTube video where 100 foot long Cat5, Cat5e, Cat 6 and Cat 7 cables were tested to determine how well each performed with a 10Gbps signals. All except the Cat 5 performed at maximum speed, with the Cat 5 performing only a few percent below 10Gbps.

        Like

      2. That may be the case, and I’m sure it is possible with good quality cat5e in lab conditions but cat6 (at up to 55m) and beyond (cat6a is 10Gbps at up to 100m) is designed for this as part of the standard. It comes down to the quality of the shielding and interference protection which as you look at newer cat standards they’re always trying to further protect the signal at faster data rates in which it becomes more volatile.

        If you want to understand just how volatile signals can be, have a read of this: https://www.reddit.com/r/sysadmin/comments/1oc8b9p/i_just_solved_the_strangest_tech_problem_ive_ever/

        TL;DR, poorly shielded HDMI cable was causing WiFi packet loss.

        Like

  4. Peter Molkenthin Avatar

    thanks for info. My devolo 1200+ has been giving me all sorts of trouble. I am getting 600 mbs on same electrical circuit as the router and devolo sender. My kitchen ring is max 50 mbs at start and end of ring but drops to 5 mbs in the centre of ring. I am an electrician and did the wiring myself. Near centre of ring there is a socket with usb chargers. I also think maybe a have a push connector (wago connectors) junction box I can no longer get access to. I have tightened all terminations which has improved the speed slightly. I wonder if usb socket is introducing noise ? Would push fit connectors have poor data transmission?

    Like

    1. How much does the wago split the power into? The main thing you’ll find is that the further into the ring you are, the more cumulative noise your signal is going to compete against, hence the lower the speed is between the endpoints. Your other issue is the switching of rings that it sounds like you’re doing. I’ve seen Devolo do some fuse board devices too especially to help with maintaining signal integrity between rings in a house, but I’ve never used one to vouch for how good it is.

      Like

      1. peter molkenthin Avatar

        Thanks Michael, the wago is just to extend a cable. Yes there is significant drop through the dual RCDs and MCBs. I thought about the dinrail docility adaptor but £400 is a bit pricey 😂. I am being a bit anal really as the Wi-Fi is at least 100 MBs without the powerline. Thanks again for your help and speedy reply.

        Like

      2. You’re most welcome. I made this decision myself when I had house works going on. I was getting 300Mbps~ in my office and then when I relocated into another room my throughput went down to 100Mbps, but I was in better WiFi range to mesh, and could then get 400-500Mbps consistently over WiFi. If you’re gonna spend £400, you’re better off looking at some WiFi 7 that will mesh over multiple channels and support the multi-link to end devices too (not that many devices support this yet but over time that will improve!)

        Like

      3. Hi PaulHope you don’t mind me contacting you directly. This devolo powerline is getting stranger by the minute.So I took a speed test

        Like

      4. Hi Peter I think part of your message got cut off there?

        Like

      5. Hi Paul

        This devolo powerline is getting stranger by the minute.

        So I took a speed test on socket left of the USB plug sockets. 7 mbs. Then removed USB charger, socket and connected ring back up with chock block. 

        1 mbs. Then run with ring disconnected at the USB charger socket point. 10 mbs. Disconnected spur to my tv and camera. Also on right side of ring.15 MBs. Disconnect right side of ring at consumer unit 22 MBs.

        Would you agree something on the right side of ring is inducing noise ? Even though nothing is plugged into it. Surely a ring should transmit data better than a radial?

        It’s very strange to me but thought maybe you could throw some light on the matter ?

        Kind regards

        Pete

        Like

      6. The truth is that everything on your ring is inducing noise, the less devices between the devolos the better. A ring will transmit data better than a radial. Anything like surge protectors in particular are going to kill the signal as they try to smooth out the frequency also.

        Like

  5. Hi. I have four Devolo units plus one connected to Router. Virgin 1000mbps router. Bandwidth was 100, now been increased by Virgin to 270, which I have verified with PC connected to router.

    I’m getting much lower speeds than I got a few months ago, typically around 50mbps.

    Any thoughts on why the speed should have dropped? Devolo no longer give any support on these units.

    Router connected unit is 1200, two others are 1200, one 500 and one 200. Speeds quoted are on 1200.

    Like

    1. Hi Hartley,

      Try to take out the 500 & 200 Mbps devices and do another test, you’re sharing your electrical wiring between all the devices so it can only operate at the speed of the slowest link.

      Like

  6. What about reliability.? I would be happy with just 5Mbps (5 Megabits per second) to have higher resilience. For example the device sending double packets to combat interference.

    Or even using two different power line sets to create a redundant path.

    Do we have something like the above in the market?

    Like

    1. Powerline-based networking is an interesting one in this context.

      Each device should act as a repeater of the signal, provided they’re all following the same compatible standards (there are multiple defined standards so 100% compatibility between your Powerline devices is a must here). But the more devices you have, the more likely you are to have reduced throughput. Even though each device would be repeating the signal, they are likely to have their own device attached and using it to communicate.

      It is also worth highlighting that just like WiFi, Powerline is a Half-Duplex technology. Meaning your total line bandwidth is going to be utilised by both download and upload traffic.

      Double packets doesn’t work well with UDP for example because unless those UDP packets are encapsulated within some form of frame management (more overhead) then how would it know the packet hasn’t already been received. Combine this with the half-duplex comment above and you’ll see how it doesn’t achieve the desired result.

      Finally, you mention 5Mbps but again if that is half-duplex, you could have any random split of time between downloading and uploading consuming that 5Mbps, experiencing 4Mbps download whilst having 1Mbps upload, or a 3/2, 2.5/2.5 or any other combination, it would be dynamic and you wouldn’t have control over it. Being confident over what is using your Powerline is useful but not explored as much as investment in WiFi spectrum optimisation (converting Multicast to Unicast etc). A specific example that comes to mind here is if you had 2x Windows PCs in your house, and then the one that gets internet via Powerline starts trying to share the latest windows update to your directly connected to internet PC, that would saturate your Powerline bandwidth.

      In summary, my advice still stands: look for the latest standards for best possible max speeds and typically improved error handling, make sure that standard is the only used standard in your network. Make sure you use Powerline over the shortest distance possible, and if its spanning different electricity rings, if you can fit Powerline devices into your RCD (I think Devolo made some that achieved this) then this will help with signal relay.

      Hope this helps.

      Like

  7. Dear Michael,

    this is the one that I have : https://www.amazon.de/dp/B07KQB6KZW?ref_=ppx_hzsearch_conn_dt_b_fed_asin_title_1

    Do you see any product that is providing an improvement ?

    What about this one? https://www.amazon.de/dp/B01GE635YG?ref=ppx_yo2ov_dt_b_fed_asin_title&th=1

    Like

    1. The Devolo uses G.hn whereas the TPLink uses AV2 standards I believe. G.hn is where future improvement efforts are being focused. But if this is to integrate into an existing Powerline network every device will have to be compatible with each other and will operate at the speed of the slowest device.

      Devolo do plug socket devices and DINRail devices to help span different power circuits in a building. So they’ve likely got more options for you to build a strong resilient network.

      Like

      1. I do not want to integrate anything 🙂 I have just the two devolo that face some disturbances. Is there a chance that with the TPLink are some chances that I will see less disruptions? TPLink is offering this 2×2 MIMO. Is this some sort of resilience scheme? Sending over the two channels?

        Like

  8. I’ve just upgraded my powerline setup from AV2 to g.hn (tplink both) and appreciate your sharing your experiences. My challenge is that I have a 16th century palazzo in Italy (the wiring isn’t that old – haha – more like mid-80s) and my internet connection is at the top floor and I have a taverna (basement) that is 4 floors down. The structure is thick (as in a meter) stone walls covered with intonaco (cross between cement and plaster). My coverage is great in the top two floors (main living quarters), not needed on the ground level (as it’s basically an entry room, but challenging in the taverna (which is large and all built in stone). I’m going to try some of your approaches to see if I can get higher, more reliable bandwidth.

    Like

Leave a reply to Hartley Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.